On the basis of its holding company structure, the Group engages in business through its Group companies across a wide range of fields that includes processed foods, marine products, meat and poultry products, temperature-controlled logistics, and biosciences. In pursuit of sustainable growth and the enhancement of corporate value over the medium to long term, the Company’s Board of Directors formulates Group strategies and supervises the business execution of operating companies.
The holding company adheres to the principles of the Corporate Governance Code and views the achievement of fair and transparent management as an important management issue. Accordingly, under the supervision of the Board of Directors, we will continue to strengthen governance by promoting appropriate resource allocation, speeding up decision-making and ensuring thorough compliance.
In addition, we have established ourselves as a company with an Audit & Supervisory Board system, an institutional design specified within the Companies Act of Japan.
■Corporate Governance Structure
■Activities Aimed at Strengthening the Nichirei Group’s Corporate Governance Structure
Composition | 10 directors (4 outside directors) |
---|---|
Number of meetings in FY2023 |
19 |
Description of operations |
Promotes proper allocation of Group resources, swift decision-making and thorough compliance through supervision of the Group’s strategy planning and business execution of operating companies. After discussion by the Group Strategy Committee, which meets twice a year, the Board of Directors formulates and approves the Group’s strategies and conducts quarterly checks of the status of implementation at each Group business. It also engages in highly effective supervision of executive directors and executive officers. |
In pursuit of sustainable growth and the enhancement of corporate value over the medium to long term, the Company’s Board of Directors formulates Group strategies and supervises the business execution of operating companies. The specific matters discussed during FY2023 were as follows.
Management Strategies | Establishment of KPIs for the Nichirei Group’s material matters (materiality) and the issues to be addressed in order to achieve them |
---|---|
Medium-term Business Plan | Progress of Medium-term Business Plan Compass Rose 2024 and issues to be addressed |
Sustainability | Formulation and promotion of the Group Human Resources Policy and the Nichirei Group’s Sustainable Marine Product Procurement Guidelines and Sustainable Palm Oil Procurement Guidelines, and issues to be addressed |
Governance | The ideal state of a monitoring model-oriented Board of Directors, as well as revisions of the Board’s official rules, regulations and the standards for agenda items in order to achieve said ideal state |
Business Strategies | Management strategy issues related to important domestic and overseas investments |
Composition | 5 Audit & Supervisory Board members (3 outside Audit & Supervisory Board members) |
---|---|
Number of meetings in FY2023 |
16 |
Description of operations |
As a body that is independent from the Board of Directors, the Audit & Supervisory Board communicates with directors, the corporate internal audit departments and other departments of the holding company in accordance with the annual audit policy and audit plan to gather information and prepare the audit environment. |
Committee | Role | Chairperson | Number of Meetings in FY2023 |
---|---|---|---|
Nominating Advisory Committee |
Discusses the suitability of candidates for senior management and directors/Audit & Supervisory Board members, as well as successor plans, and reports its findings to the Board of Directors. | Kuniko Shoji Outside Director |
8 |
Remuneration Advisory Committee |
Discusses the remuneration system, remuneration levels, the appropriateness of remuneration amounts, and other related matters, and reports to the Board of Directors. | Kenji Hamashima Outside Director |
5 |
The Board of Directors comprises up to 11 members, appointed to one-year terms in order to enhance flexibility in response to changes in business conditions. Resolutions to appoint directors must be approved by a majority of shareholders, with at least one third of those shareholders who have voting rights in attendance. To improve transparency and strengthen supervisory functions, three of the current 10 directors are outside directors. The Board meets at least once a month. The Board of Directors is chaired by the Representative Director and Chairman, who also serves as an executive officer. Together, the Representative Director and Chairman and the Representative Director and President oversee the Group’s overall execution of business.
Nichirei has adopted the audit & supervisory board member system. Of the five audit & supervisory board members, three are outside audit & supervisory board members, of whom one has experience at a financial institution, another is an experienced attorney, and the third has worked at a government agency. Audit & Supervisory Board meets once a month, in principle, convening additional meetings as necessary. Nichirei has established a framework to enhance the supervisory functions of audit & supervisory board members, allowing for the effective use of audit & supervisory board members, and strengthening the supervisory role of management.
The Company adheres to its Criteria for Independence when appointing outside directors and outside audit & supervisory board members designated by the Company as independent directors/audit & supervisory board members. A vested interest in Nichirei is denied outside directors and their close relatives, as well as outside audit & supervisory board members and any companies or organizations of which they are directors or that they serve in other important positions.
The Nichirei Group believes that in order for the Board of Directors to effectively fulfill its roles and responsibilities, it must be composed of both internal and external members with sufficient knowledge and experience in fields related to business management. We have designated the following knowledge and experience as important from a corporate management perspective. In addition to having appropriate experience in all of the following areas, the Company selects director candidates based on the areas in which the Company has particular expectations.
Corporate Management | Demonstrated leadership in corporate management as a top executive; management experience at a listed company with diverse stakeholders |
---|---|
ESG/Sustainability | Experience and expertise in promoting ESG initiatives; knowledge of and experience in making value judgments about ESG and social significance and sustainability for companies; knowledge and experience in promoting corporate sustainability; experience and expertise in human resource development related to continuously developing diverse human resources |
Global | Cross-cultural communication skills and a high level of ability to get things done in overseas business as well as knowledge and expertise about markets, economies and business in specific countries and regions gained through experience including the management of local subsidiaries |
Innovation/Marketing | Knowledge and expertise that contribute to promoting innovation; experience and expertise in sales and marketing |
Corporate Management | Demonstrated leadership in corporate management as a top executive; management experience at a listed company with diverse stakeholders |
---|---|
Financial Accounting/Finance | Expertise in financial accounting related to financial reporting and auditing; experience and expertise in corporate financing and management |
Legal Affairs/Compliance | Experience and expertise in legal compliance, regulatory compliance, internal controls, and promotion of norms and corporate behavior required by society; experience in the legal profession; expertise and network related to quality assurance |
Corporate Management |
ESG/ Sustainability |
Global | Research & Development | Marketing | Human Resources Strategy | DX | Financial Accounting/ Finance |
Legal Affairs/ Compliance |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Directors | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||
● (Processed foods) |
● | ● | ● | |||||||
● (Marine, meat and poultry products) |
● | ● | ||||||||
● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||
● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||
● (Logistics) |
● | ● | ● | |||||||
● | ● | ● | ||||||||
● | ● | ● | ● | ● | ||||||
● | ● | ● | ● | |||||||
● | ● | ● | ||||||||
● | ● | ● | ||||||||
Audit & Supervisory Board Members |
● | ● | ● | |||||||
● | ● | |||||||||
● | ● | |||||||||
● | ● | |||||||||
● | ● |
The Company positions the succession plan for the representative director, president as one of its most important issues, and implements this initiative from a medium- to long-term perspective based on the Group’s Management Principles. Specifically, the Nominating Advisory Committee, which is chaired by an outside director, carries out training, monitoring, and selection of successor candidates according to the selection process, and reports its findings to the Board of Directors based on thorough discussions.
Based on the Nominating Advisory Committee’s report, the Board of Directors approves the proposed new Group officer structure and decides on the representative director, president.
Design of the remuneration scheme for directors and executive officers incorporates the opinions of a third-party organization. Remuneration comprises a base remuneration component and a bonus component. Base remuneration is paid at a fixed rate determined in accordance with a remuneration schedule. Bonuses are paid according to the concept of productivity-linked bonuses, based on the results of the Nichirei Group, the performance-budget achievement rate of the relevant officer’s business area, and an individual qualitative assessment. Outside directors receive base remuneration only; they are not paid a bonus. Nichirei has established a Remuneration Advisory Committee which meets, in principle, once a year to deliberate on such topics as the remuneration system, remuneration levels, and the validity of remuneration, before reporting its findings to the Board of Directors. The committee comprises the Representative Director and President, a audit & supervisory board member, and outside directors. Officer remuneration is determined by the Board of Directors. The total amount of remuneration and bonuses paid to directors must be within the limit resolved at a General Meeting of Shareholders.
The policy for determining individual director remuneration is for the Remuneration Advisory Committee to discuss the appropriateness of each director’s remuneration each fiscal year and for the decision to be made by the Board of Directors. In these discussions, the Remuneration Advisory Committee reflects changes in the management environment and the opinions of shareholders and investors, and obtains information necessary for discussion from third-party agencies with extensive global knowledge and experience.
We have decided to change the performance-linked bonus key performance indicator (KPI) in conjunction with the start of Medium-Term Business Plan Compass Rose 2024 in FY2023. Specifically, ROIC and profit were selected to replace REP1 in order to optimize the business portfolio and improve capital efficiency and shareholder returns. In addition, we adopted a new way of utilizing ESG third-party assessments2 to strengthen our response to sustainability-related issues. There are no other significant changes in the policy for determining officer remuneration.
Before Revision (Up to FY2022) | After Revision (From FY2023) | Reasons for Selection of KPIs |
---|---|---|
Consolidated net sales | Consolidated net sales | Expansion of size of Company |
Consolidated EBITDA | Consolidated EBITDA | Improvement of ability to generate cash and profitability of core businesses |
Consolidated REP*1 | Consolidated profit | Improvement of shareholder returns |
Consolidated ROIC | Optimization of business portfolio and improvement of capital efficiency | |
― | ESG third-party assessment*2 | Strengthen response sustainability-related issues |
ESG Third-party Assessments | Reason for Selection |
---|---|
|
|
Directors (Excluding Outside Directors) |
|
---|---|
Outside Directors |
|
Basic (fixed) remuneration consists of role-based remuneration and a director allowance, and variable remuneration consists of performance-linked bonuses and stock compensation. Remuneration levels are set at appropriate amounts with reference to objective compensation market survey data (compensation levels of companies competing with the Group in terms of business and human resources, including those in the food and logistics industries), taking into consideration the responsibilities and number of directors, changes in the business environment going forward, and the opinions of third-party organizations.
●Guideline for the Ratio of Remuneration for Directors Excluding Outside Directors
Remuneration Composition | Purpose/Description |
---|---|
Role-based Remuneration | Basic remuneration performance of duties Set according to the significance of the role of each director |
Director Allowance | Remuneration for the responsibilities of making and supervising the execution of management decisions Set at a uniform amount for all directors |
Performance-linked Bonuses | Remuneration for motivating directors to achieve annual financial and strategic goals The amount paid when achieving goals (“standard amount”) is set as a percentage of role-based compensation Paid within a range of 0-200% of the standard amount according to degree of achievement |
Stock Compensation (Restricted Shares) | Remuneration for encouraging management from a long-term/Group-wide perspective and the perspective of shareholders and investors Value of shares issued each fiscal year (“standard amount”) is set as a percentage of role-based compensation Restricted shares are issued annually in an amount equal to the standard amount, and restrictions are lifted upon a director’s retirement |
Only basic (fixed) remuneration is paid to outside directors. The level of remuneration is set at an appropriate amount, taking into consideration the time and effort spent by each outside director fulfilling expected roles and functions, as well as objective compensation market survey data (compensation levels of companies similar in business type and size to that of the Company).
The amount of money to be paid to each individual as a performance-linked bonus varies within a range of 0% to 200% of the base amount for each position, depending on the achievement of Company-wide, business and individual performance targets.
Amount of individual bonus = Base amount by position × Performance evaluation coefficient (0–200%)
Performance evaluation coefficient = (a) Company-wide performance evaluation coefficient + (b) Business performance evaluation coefficient + (c) Individual performance evaluation coefficient
Evaluation Weight | (a) Company-wide Performance Evaluation | (b) Business Performance Evaluation | (c) Individual Performance Evaluation | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Net sales | EBITDA | Profit | ROIC | ESG | Net sales | EBITDA | ROIC | ||
Representative Director, President | 100% | - | - | ||||||
10% | 40% | 10% | 20% | 20% | |||||
Director (In Charge of Business) | 60% | 30% | 10% | ||||||
10% | 20% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 5% | 15% | 10% | ||
Director (In Charge of Function) | 70% | - | 30% | ||||||
5% | 30% | 5% | 15% | 15% |
In order to ensure appropriateness and objectivity in matters related to remuneration for individual directors, the Remuneration Advisory Committee, comprising mainly independent outside directors, discusses matters first and reports its findings to the Board of Directors, which then makes its decisions.
The details of officer remuneration for FY2023 are presented in the 105th Annual Securities Report.
Classification of Officers | Classification of Officers' Total Amount of Compensation, etc. by Type (Millions of Yen) | Total Amount of Compensation, etc. (Millions of yen) |
Number of eligible persons Number of officers (persons) |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Basic remuneration | Performance-linked bonus | Restricted shares compensation | |||
Directors (excluding outside directors) | 110 (210) |
30 (63) |
62 (62) |
203 (336) |
7 (7) |
Outside directors | 46 | ー | ー | 46 | 6 |
Audit & Supervisory Board (excluding outside Audit & Supervisory Board members) | 48 | ー | ー | 48 | 3 |
Outside Audit & Supervisory Board members | 32 | ー | ー | 32 | 3 |
Total | 237 (337) |
30 (63) |
62 (62) |
330 (463) |
19 (19) |
Classification of Officers | Date of resolution of the General Meeting of Shareholders | Basic remuneration | Performance-linked bonus | Restricted shares | Number of officers | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Director | June 25, 2019 (101st Annual General Shareholders Meeting) | Up to 270 million yen (including Outside Directors: up to 50 million yen) | Up to 130 million yen | Up to 100 million yen | Up to 70,000 shares | 10(including Outside Directors: 3) |
Audit & Supervisory Board Members | June 26, 2012 (94th General Shareholders Meeting) | Up to 120 million yen | - | - | 5(of which Outside Audit & Supervisory Board Members: 3) |
As necessary, and with the assistance of outside experts, the Company conducts analyses and evaluations of the Board of Directors’ activities to ensure its decision-making is effective. Summaries of the results are subsequently disclosed.
Evaluation Procedure | Subjects: Directors and Audit & Supervisory Board members (15 individuals in total) Period: January–February 2023 Method: Self-assessment involving questionnaires conducted by third-party experts |
---|---|
Evaluation Results for FY2023 | Overall, the largely positive comments affirmed that the Board is maintaining a satisfactory level of effectiveness. Comments included appreciation of the ability to conduct free and open-minded exchanges of opinion in an atmosphere that encourages people to speak up, and of the fact that agenda items are subject to annual scheduling and reviews as part of efforts to ensure more productive discussions at Board meetings. |
Issues Identified | Evaluation and Opinion | Future Approach |
---|---|---|
1.Materials and Standards for Agenda Items | While there were positive evaluations of the substantial discussions held at Board of Directors’ meetings, there were also comments pointing out that deliberations often exceeded the pre-allotted time and that Board meetings were held too often, as well as comments suggesting room for further improvement in the quality of discussions. | Proposals on highly important matters, such as investments or capital contributions, tend to involve substantial explanations and a large amount of supporting materials. As well as encouraging departments making proposals to remain conscious of the need for presentation materials to be easy to understand, the Board of Directors’ Secretariat is more closely involved in proposals, with the aim of providing support from the meeting material preparation stage. In this way, the information necessary for decision-making and supervision by the Board will be organized more effectively, improving the content and quality of the materials—for example, by omitting additional information that should be handled by the executive side. In addition, presentations held on the day of Board meetings will have shorter explanation sections, focused on the key points from the relevant materials, to ensure adequate time for deliberations. On April 1, 2023, we made monitoring model-oriented revisions to the standards for Board of Directors’ meeting agenda items. Going forward, we will continuously analyze and review the effectiveness of these revisions. |
2.Institutional Design | There does not appear to be any problem with the current institutional design of a company with an Audit & Supervisory Board system. However, many respondents expressed opinions indicating that they would prefer discussions on the design and system to continue. | Although we do not consider a change in the institutional design to be necessary at this time, it was decided that discussions on an appropriate institutional design should be held on an ongoing basis, in light of management strategies, changes in the business environment going forward, and Corporate Governance Code requirements. In addition, from the perspective that the Board of Directors should focus even more strongly on strategic discussions, our current institutional design of a company with an Audit & Supervisory Board system is bound by constraints under the Companies Act of Japan, in relation to individual and specific business execution decisions being entrusted to the executive side (revisions to standards for agenda items, as part of point 1 on the previous page). Based on those constraints, we will continue to discuss the extent to which the monitoring model should be implemented, including a comparative analysis between the company with Audit & Supervisory Board system and other institutional designs. The progress of these discussions will be reported to and deliberated at Board of Directors’ meetings as necessary. |
3.Sharing Details of Deliberations by the Nominating Advisory Committee and the Remuneration Advisory Committee | Several respondents, mainly officers who are not committee members, pointed out that while each committee reports to the Board of Directors, details of discussions at each committee meeting are not always shared. | While it may be preferable to share the details of advisory committee discussions at Board of Directors’ meetings, we recognize that doing so may adversely affect the free and open-minded atmosphere at both voluntary committees. Thus, it was decided that the extent to which details of discussions at the Nominating Advisory Committee and the Remuneration Advisory Committee will be shared at Board of Directors’ meetings should be subject to ongoing consideration by both committees. |
Nichirei Integrated Report 2022>Evaluations of Effectiveness
Nichirei Integrated Report 2021>Evaluations of Effectiveness
Nichirei Integrated Report 2020>Evaluations of Effectiveness
Nichirei distributes materials for use at Board of Directors meetings to each director and Audit & Supervisory Board member at least three days in advance of meetings in order to ensure meaningful discussions.
When internal communication and coordination are required to accurately provide Company information in response to instructions from independent outside directors or independent outside Audit & Supervisory Board members, the secretary in charge acts as the contact point in order to ensure necessary coordination with relevant departments.
Newly appointed directors and Audit & Supervisory Board members are given training as necessary on the Companies Act and other related laws, management strategy, financial analysis and other such matters. Additional training on legislative revisions and management issues is provided as necessary after new members assume office. Moreover, explanations of the Group’s businesses and tours of the major facilities are provided to outside officers as necessary.
Cross-shareholdings are only utilized when it is determined that they will contribute to improving the Company’s corporate value: for example, by maintaining and strengthening trade and cooperative relationships. In addition, every year the Board of Directors reviews the economic rationale of individual shareholdings of this type from a medium- to long-term perspective. If the importance of a particular shareholding is determined to have diminished, the shares are sold. In conducting such reviews, the Board of Directors carefully examines and makes a comprehensive judgment on whether the benefits, such as profits from transactions, and dividends or risks are commensurate with the cost of capital, followed by consideration of a qualitative evaluation of the strategic importance of the shareholding.
In regard to the exercise of voting rights for cross-shareholdings, the Company will review all the details of the relevant proposals in the investee company’s shareholders meeting agenda, and if any of the following apply to the investee company, the Company will make a decision after careful examination on a case-by-case basis:
(1) The investee has engaged in acts that will lead to a loss of shareholder value
(2) The investee’s performance or stock price has deteriorated significantly
(3) There are other serious doubts with respect to agreeing to the proposal